Let’s face it—we’ve all seen it happen. Someone jumps a red light, parks illegally, or skips paying for a train ride. They get away with it. Maybe once, maybe multiple times. The fines? Easily ignored. And that’s where the problem lies.
When fines are disconnected from real consequences, they lose their sting. What if we could change that?
The Real Problem with Penalties Today
In most places, fines are treated as standalone punishments. You get a ticket. You ignore it. Life goes on.
But what if unpaid fines actually disrupted your daily life? What if breaking the rules meant you couldn’t renew your driver’s license, update your passport, or register a property? Suddenly, that minor violation has lasting consequences—and that’s the point.
How It Should Work: Linking Fines to Real-World Services
Imagine this:
-
You have five unpaid parking fines.
-
You go to renew your license.
-
You’re told: “Sorry, you must clear your outstanding fines first.”
It’s not cruel—it’s consequential. The same way actions have consequences in life, rule-breaking should lead to tangible inconvenience.
This model can extend far beyond traffic fines:
Property Transactions
No fine clearance? No property registration or sale. Want to transfer your apartment? Better check your fine history first.
Government Services
Whether it's Centrelink payments or business registrations, unpaid fines should show up as red flags. Those receiving welfare support could have fines deducted in small increments, maintaining fairness while reinforcing accountability.
Public Transport Violations
Turnstile jumpers at train stations are rarely fined in the moment. But now with facial recognition and smart surveillance, fines could be issued automatically. Offenders receive a notice, and unless paid, future trips are blocked or more expensive.
This isn't just possible—it’s already being tested in some cities.
The Key Ingredient: Pain That Scales
We don’t want to bankrupt people—we want them to feel the right amount of discomfort. A $200 fine may be painful for one person and pocket change for another.
Solution? Income-based fines.
High earners get proportionally higher fines. And at tax time, any unpaid penalties are automatically deducted. Everyone feels the pinch—fairly.
Accountability by Design
People often say, “You can’t legislate morality.” That’s true. But you can design systems where compliance is the path of least resistance, and non-compliance is just too inconvenient.
By linking fines to essential services—licenses, passports, property deals, tax returns—we’re not punishing people. We’re reminding them that rules exist for a reason, and that breaking them creates discomfort not just for others—but for themselves too.
Final Thought: The Discomfort That Drives Change
Inconvenience is a powerful motivator. If ignoring the rules means you can’t drive, fly, buy, sell, or get paid—people will pay attention.
And if that leads to safer streets, better public transport, and more respectful communities, isn’t it worth a little discomfort?
Have thoughts on this? Agree? Disagree? Drop them in the comments—I’d love to hear your perspective.
